Size-resolved characterization of organic aerosol in the North China Plain: new insights from high resolution spectral analysis
编号:3535
访问权限:私有
更新:2023-04-16 15:23:03 浏览:454次
快闪报告
摘要
Organic aerosol (OA), a large fraction of fine particles, has a large impact on climate radiative forcing and human health, and the impact depends strongly on size distributions. Here we conducted size-resolved OA measurements using high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometer at urban and rural sites in the North China Plain (NCP) in summer and winter. Our results showed substantially different size distributions of OA with the diameters peaking at ~550 nm in summer, and 420 nm and 350 nm at urban and rural sites, respectively, during wintertime. Positive matrix factorization (PMF) of size-resolved high-resolution mass spectra of OA resolved various OA factors at urban and rural sites. In particular, we found that the mass spectra of the same type of secondary OA (SOA) from bulk PMF analysis can be largely different across different sizes. Biomass burning OA (BBOA) and fossil-fuel-related OA (FFOA) showed broad size distributions peaking at 350 nm in winter at the rural site, where primary OA (POA= BBOA + FFOA) dominated OA across different sizes. Comparatively, secondary OA (SOA) in the NCP peaked at ~400 – 500 nm during wintertime, and ~500 – 650 nm in summer. SOA played an enhanced role during more severely polluted days with peak diameters shifting to larger sizes, while the changes in POA size distributions were small. The size-resolved oxygen-to-carbon (O/C) ratios were also determined and linked with hygroscopicity parameter of OA (κOA). The results showed that κOA increased substantially with particle size, with higher values in summer in Beijing (0.28 ± 0.021) than those during wintertime (0.17 ± 0.019 and 0.12 ± 0.018). The size-resolved κOA would benefit a better prediction of cloud condensation nuclei than bulk κOA in future studies.
关键词
Organic aerosol,Positive matrix factorization,Size distributions,Hygroscopicity parameter
稿件作者
徐惟琦
中国科学院大气物理研究所
陈醇
中国科学院大气物理研究所
邱艳梅
中国科学院大气物理研究所
孙业乐
中国科学院大气物理研究所
发表评论