IEEE ICHVE 2022 / 1-PAGE ABSTRACT
Comparison of thermal degradation for aPP and sPP as potential cable insulating materials
Jiazhi Gao1, Liang Cao1, Chao Tang1, Ya Zhang2, Zhongyi Zhou2, Ye You3
1 College of Engineering and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China
2 Chongqing Taishan Cable Co., Ltd., Chongqing, China
3 State Grid Chongqing Shibei Power Supply Company, Chongqing, China
liangcao2020@swu.edu.cn
Purpose
As a typical insulating material for power cable, crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) exhibits superior electrical endurance and mechanical performance under a higher temperature owing to crosslinking. Crosslinking process changes the material from thermoplastic to thermoset, which also becomes an obstacle in recycling the insulation after cable retires. Recent years, polypropylene-based materials have aroused wide attention and show a great potential as insulation for power cables. Researches show that in short-term properties, polypropylene-based materials can meet the demands of power cable and even be better than XLPE. However, as an important aspect, aging performance of polypropylene (PP) for power cable has not been intensively investigated. This paper compares the thermal degradation of atactic polypropylene (aPP) and syndiotatic polypropylene (sPP), promoting the application of polypropylene in cable insulation.
Experimental methods
Pellets of aPP and sPP were purchased from the same supplier. Plate specimens with a dimension of 10mm×10mm×1mm were made by hot-pressing at 190
oC and 15MPa. Samples were put in the oven at a series of temperatures including 130
oC, 135
oC, 140
oC, 145
oC, and 150
oC for 168 hours. Before and after aging test, structural characterizations such as infrared spectroscopy (IR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and X-ray diffraction analysis were conducted. Besides, tensile tests and volume resistivity measurements were also performed.
Results
With the increase of aging temperature, aPP an sPP show a similar behavior. Tensile strength and volume resistivity of both decrease. At the same temperature, sPP shows a better performance in tensile tests and volume resistivity measurements than that aPP does. These phenomena are attributed to their differences in structure.
Conclusions
This paper compares aging performance of sPP and aPP at different temperatures. The increase of crystallinity for PP sacrifices the mechanical flexibility but increase its anti-aging properties.