123 / 2021-06-29 01:25:55

国内外同伴互动研究2006-2021动态可视化对比分析 A Comparative Visualization Analysis of Research in Chinese and International Journals on Peer Interaction from 2006 to 2021

peer interaction,,CiteSpace;,Visualization

同伴互动（peer interaction）文献可视化分析主要集中于国内（张一宁和林小萌，2020）或者国外（徐锦芬和张珊珊，2019）的单边研究，少有文献对二者的研究热点以及核心研究领域进行对比。因此，本文在SSCI以及CSSCI上对2006年到2021年间以peer interaction、negotiated interaction、peer feedback、collaborative dialogue、collaborative writing、peer scaffolding（徐锦芬和张姗姗，2019）为主题的发表在System、Language Teaching and Research、Teaching and Teacher Education、Language and Education、Modern Language Journal、Teachers and Teaching、Tesol Quarterly、Journal of Second Language Writing等期刊上的文献进行了收集，得到英文期刊1026篇以及中文期刊291篇。随后本文用CiteSpace对这些文献进行了量化分析，研究发现国内外研究聚类结构显著，同质性较高，但国外研究集中化趋势明显，而国内研究集中化趋势不如国外明显。同时，质性分析发现语言相关片段、同伴反馈以及同伴评价是国外同伴互动研究中三大热门话题。除此之外，过程性研究，如合作对话过程、合作写作过程也引起了学者的广泛关注。而国内同伴研究相对局限，主要在社会文化视域下展开。因此，同伴互动研究在国内的仍有较大的发展空间。

The visualization analysis of peer interaction research used to be unilateral studies aimed at the international or domestic fields (Xu and Zhang, 2019; Zhang and Lin, 2020). Therefore, a comparative visualization analysis of research in Chinese and international journals on peer interaction is carried out. The study searches for the paper with themes, including peer interaction, negotiated interaction, peer feedback, collaborative dialogue, collaborative writing and peer scaffolding (Xu and Zhang, 2019), which is published in System, Language Teaching and Research, Teaching and Teacher Education, Language and Education, Modern Language Journal, Teachers and Teaching, Tesol Quarterly, Journal of Second Language Writing, etc. and finally collects 1026 paper in English and 291 in Chinese and analyzed them with CiteSpace and finds that both Chinese and international research have clear cluster structures. However, international research has a better centralization than Chinese one does. Besides, it is also discovered that language-related episodes, peer feedback, and peer assessment are the top three research hotpots. Meanwhile, Chinese research mainly takes a social-cultural perspective.